Prediction of Kody Pearson [862nd] vs Reece Falck [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LH2H: Pearson 1 - 0 Falck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pearson winning 2 and Falck winning 0. The last match between Pearson and Falck was at the M25 Caloundra, 19-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Kody Pearson getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kody Pearson | 1 |
| Reece Falck | 0 |
| Pearson | Stats | Falck |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (7-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 862 | Ranking | N/A |
| 790 | Highest Rank | |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (122-120) | Career Total W/L | 54% (37-31) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Kody Pearson
Player
Reece Falck
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:30:0 | Average Match Time | 2:30:0 |
| 70% (56/80) | 1st Serve % | 57% (45/79) |
| 57% (32/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (28/45) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 46% (36/79) | Return Points Win % | 43% (34/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kody Pearson vs Reece Falck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pearson 1 - 0 Falck
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pearson has won 38.75% of points on their second serve, while Falck has won 44.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pearson, in recent form, has won 47.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Falck has won 46.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.85% and 28.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pearson has saved 48.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Falck has saved 57.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pearson has won 40.54% of matches played (W/L 15/ 22), with Falck winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pearson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Falck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Pearson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17), where as Falck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pearson winning 1 times and Falck being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pearson winning 2 and Falck winning 0. The last match between Pearson and Falck was at the M25 Caloundra, 19-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Kody Pearson getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pearson and Falck have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pearson winning 0 times and Falck 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pearson winning 1, and Falck 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pearson has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.65 while Falck has played against players with an average rank of 58.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pearson has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Falck has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pearson has converted 33.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Falck has converted 39.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kody Pearson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Kody Pearson
72%
(
95 of
132)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
116)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
53 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
128
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Atharva Sharma
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 4-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Minjong Park
Player
Kody Pearson
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Vullnet Tashi
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Kody Pearson
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 6-1 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Kody Pearson
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Kody Pearson
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Reece Falck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pijus Vaitiekunas
Player
Reece Falck
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
30 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Konstantin Zhzhenov
Player
Reece Falck
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-7(7) 6-2 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Reece Falck
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reece Falck
Player
Nicaise Muamba
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Pearson vs Falck?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Pearson Vs Falck is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (122/120) | Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) |
| 50% (274/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (84/66) |
| 51% (2618/2518) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (784/676) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 396 | Aces Total | 164 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 644 | Total Double Faults | 150 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 141.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 65.6 |
| 61% (5888/9699) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1375/2339) |
| 66% (3913/5888) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (965/1375) |
| 45% (1715/3811) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (450/964) |
| 42% (387/925) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (77/200) |
| 39% (3767/9585) | Return Points Win % | 37% (862/2347) |
| 50% (120/240) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (35/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (23/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 52% (33/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 86% (110/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (38/33) |
| 14% (110/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (38/4) |
| 20% (132/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (30/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
